The feasibility of normalizing CALL in teaching; analysing teacher’s and administrator’s attitudes
Resumen
This paper analyses the attitudes of administrators and teachers towards the normalization of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in their context. It is divided into six paragraphs to synthesize theoretical orientations, research methodology, context and participants in line with previous related studies. In order to contrast the interviewees’ attitudes, they were enquired with questions related to CALL.Citas
Ayres, R. (2002). Learner attitudes towards the use of CALL. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15, 241-249.
Bax, S. (2003). CALL--past, present and future. System, 31, 13-28 Chambers, A. & Bax, S. (2006). Making CALL work: Towards normalization. System, 34, 465-479.
Chappelle, C. (2001). Innovative language learning: achieving the vision. ReCALL, 13, 3-14.
Coleman, J. (2005). CALL from the margins: effective dissemination of CALL research and good practices. ReCALL 17, 18–31.
Felix, U. (2004). A multivariate analysis of secondary students’ experience of web-based language learning. ReCALL, 16, 129 – 141
Felix, U. (2005). Analysing Recent CALL Effectiveness Research—Towards a Common Agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18, 1 – 32.
Kessler, G. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward Technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 173 – 188.
